Waddington v. Sarausad
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Oct 15, 2008
|Jan 21, 2009||6-3||Thomas||OT 2008|
Issue: Whether, on federal habeas review, courts must accept state court determinations that jury instructions fully and correctly set out state law with regard to accomplice liability.
Plain English Summary:
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas on January 21, 2009.
- Court grants review of indecency law, 7 other cases (Lyle Denniston)
Briefs and DocumentsMerit briefs
- Brief for Petitioner Doug Waddington
- Brief for Respondent Cesar Sarausad
- Reply Brief for Petitioner Doug Waddington