Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

On Monday at 9:30 a.m. we expect orders from the April 24 Conference. We expect one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. on Wednesday.

Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
10-779 2d Cir. Apr 26, 2011
Tr.Aud.
Jun 23, 2011 6-3 Kennedy OT 2010

Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe and Russell P.C. represents the respondents IMS Health, SDI, and Verispan, in this case.

Holding: Vermont's Prescription Confidentiality Law, which absent the prescriber's consent prohibits the sale of prescriber-identifying information, as well as the disclosure or use of that information for marketing purposes, is subject to heightened judicial scrutiny because it imposes content- and speaker-based burdens on protected expression. Vermont's justifications for the prohibition cannot withstand such heightened scrutiny.

Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy on June 23, 2011. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg and Kagan.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs

Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards