Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

We expect orders from the February 17 conference on Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. There is a possibility of opinions on Wednesday, February 22.
On Tuesday the court hears oral argument in Hernández v. Mesa. Amy Howe has our preview.
On Tuesday the court also hears oral argument in McLane Co. v. EEOC. Charlotte Garden has our preview.

Nevada Comm. on Ethics v. Carrigan

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
10-568 Nevada Supreme Court Apr 27, 2011
Tr.Aud.
Jun 13, 2011 9-0 Scalia OT 2010
 
Share:

Disclosure: John Elwood, a regular contributor to the blog, serves as counsel to the petitioner. Although Amy Howe, the editor of the blog, served as a judge on one of John’s moots before the argument, Goldstein, Howe, & Russell was not otherwise involved in the case.

Holding: The Nevada Ethics in Government Law, which prohibits a legislator who has a conflict of interest from both voting on a proposal and from advocating its passage or failure, is not unconstitutionally overbroad.

Plain English Summary:

Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia on June 13, 2011. Justice Kennedy filed a concurring opinion. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-stage documents

Term Snapshot
Awards