Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

The Senate Judiciary Committee has concluded its hearing on the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Transcripts of previous live blogs are available at this link.
Our full coverage of the nomination is available at this link.

Magwood v. Patterson

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
09-158 11th Cir. Mar 24, 2010
Tr.
Jun 24, 2010 5-4 Thomas OT 2009
 
Share:

Disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in this case.

Holding: A state prisoner can often petition a federal court for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging her state court conviction or sentence. But she generally may not file a second or successive application for habeas relief. In Magwood, the defendant prevailed on habeas and had his case sent back to the state courts for a new sentencing proceeding, After the state court imposed the same sentence again, he again sought federal habeas relief. This time, he raised a new argument that could have been in his initial application but was not. The Supreme Court held that when a state prisoner obtains federal habeas relief and is re-sentenced, a habeas application challenging the new judgment is not “second or successive, even if the prisoner could have challenged the original sentence on the same ground.

Plain English Summary:

Judgment: Reversed and Remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas on June 24, 2010. Justice Kennedy dissented, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Ginsburg and Alito.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs

[edit] Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-stage documents

Term Snapshot
Awards