Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

We expect orders from the February 24 conference on Monday at 9:30 a.m. There is a possibility of opinions on Wednesday, March 1.

Kloeckner v. Solis

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-184 8th Cir. Oct 2, 2012
Tr.Aud.
Dec 10, 2012 9-0 Kagan OT 2012
 
Share:

Holding: A federal employee who claims that an agency action appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board violates an antidiscrimination statute listed in 5 U.S.C. § 7702(a)(1) should seek judicial review in district court, rather than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, regardless whether the MSPB decided her case on procedural grounds or on the merits.

Plain English Summary:

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on December 10, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Holding: A federal employee who claims that an agency action appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board violates an antidiscrimination statute listed in 5 U.S.C. § 7702(a)(1) should seek judicial review in district court, not the Federal Circuit, regardless whether the Board decided her case on procedural grounds or on the merits.   JudgmentReversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on December 10, 2012.
Term Snapshot
Awards