Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund
Petition for certiorari denied on March 18, 2013
Issue: Whether the Second Circuit erred in concluding,
in direct conflict with a decision from the First Circuit on the same issue, that a representative plaintiff
has standing to assert on behalf of absent class
members claims for relief that the representative
plaintiff lacks standing to assert on its own behalf.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Oct 26 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 3, 2012) |
| Nov 16 2012 | Consent to the filing of amicus briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. |
| Nov 20 2012 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs,in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent. |
| Nov 26 2012 | Waiver of right of respondent NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund to respond filed. |
| Dec 3 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed. |
| Dec 3 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of DRI - Voice of the Defense Bar filed. |
| Dec 5 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013. |
| Dec 6 2012 | Response Requested . (Due January 7, 2013) |
| Dec 13 2012 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 4, 2013. |
| Feb 4 2013 | Brief of respondent NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund in opposition filed. |
| Feb 19 2013 | Reply of petitioners Goldman, Sachs & Co., et al. filed. |
| Feb 20 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 15, 2013. |
| Mar 18 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
