Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Dec 3, 2012
|Apr 16, 2013||5-4||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: Because respondent had no personal interest in representing putative, unnamed claimants, nor any other continuing interest that would preserve her suit from mootness, her suit was appropriately dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Plain English Summary:
Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 16, 2013. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor joined.
- Opinion recap: A "pick off" strategy works (Lyle Denniston)
- Argument recap: Will sympathy or technicality prevail? (Lyle Denniston)
- Argument preview: Scuttling a workers' pay case (Lyle Denniston)
- Petition of the day (Matthew Bush)