Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week the blog will publish a multi-part online symposium on United States v. Texas, a challenge by Texas and twenty-five states to the Obama administration's deferred-action policy for immigration. Contributions to this special feature, as well as an “explainer” by this blog's Lyle Denniston, are available here.

Bobby v. Dixon

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
10-1540 6th Cir. Not Argued Nov 7, 2011 9-0 Per Curiam OT 2011

Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit contravened the directives of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) when it abandoned the "in custody" requirement of Miranda v. Arizona and Edwards v. Arizona; (2) whether the interviewer's state of mind has any bearing on whether a suspect's statement is voluntary under the established law of Oregon v. Elstad; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit exceeded its authority under AEDPA when it condemned the use of the "prisoner's dilemma" where the police indicate that favorable treatment will go to the first suspect who cooperates as an unconstitutionally coercive interrogation tactic.

Judgment: Summary reversal in a per curiam opinion on November 7, 2011.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

 

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards