Merits cases remaining for October Term 2012
Posted on June 19, 2013 at 8:39 am by Kedar Bhatia
Following Monday’s decisions, there are fourteen merits cases from October Term 2012 that have not yet been decided. Although we do not know which decisions the Court will issue on which days, we expect the Court to issue all of these remaining decisions between tomorrow, Thursday, June 20, 2013, and the end of June, when [...]
Relist Watch
Posted on June 18, 2013 at 9:39 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. As the world gathers at One First Street to watch the Term’s remaining blockbusters indelibly change life as we know it, life in the Relist Watch tidal eddy continues at its normal unrushed pace. Two of this week’s grants paid their dues in the Relist Watch bush leagues before [...]
Petition of the day
Posted on June 18, 2013 at 8:04 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: [PAGE]12-1055[/PAGE]
Tuesday round-up
Posted on June 18, 2013 at 11:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Coverage and commentary focused on the five opinions that the Court issued yesterday; this blog’s round-ups of the early coverage of the decisions can be found here and here. Coverage of the opinion in Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., in which the Court held that an Arizona law requiring proof of [...]
Petition of the day
Posted on June 18, 2013 at 8:33 am by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: [PAGE]12-1175[/PAGE]
Menu of today’s coverage (UPDATED: 9:40)
Posted on June 17, 2013 at 9:41 pm by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court granted four new cases and issued five opinions. Lyle’s report on the opinion in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona (including a “Plain English” summary) is here. Marty Lederman’s post examining the possible implications of the decision is here. Tejinder Singh also provided our initial analysis of that decision. Lyle has coverage of the decision in Salinas v. Texas (including a [...]
Reconciling ceilings and floors: Alleyne v. United States
Posted on June 17, 2013 at 9:39 pm by Mike Gottlieb
If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. That would seem to be the lesson from the Court’s decision in Alleyne v. United States, which today resolved a decade-old controversy regarding the constitutional distinction between two kinds of sentences: mandatory minimums and statutory maximums.
Opinion recap: If you want to claim the Fifth . . .
Posted on June 17, 2013 at 5:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
Analysis Because merely keeping quiet when police ask damaging questions is not claiming a right to silence, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, prosecutors may use that silence against the suspect at the trial. If an individual is voluntarily talking to the police, he or she must claim the Fifth Amendment right of silence, or lose [...]
Opinion analysis: Turns out, turnabout is fair play
Posted on June 17, 2013 at 5:05 pm by Kevin Russell
This morning the Court issued its decision in Maracich v. Spears. In a blow to plaintiffs’ attorneys, the Court narrowly construed the so-called “litigation exception” to the federal Drivers’ Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), ruling that the exception did not cover (and that the DPPA therefore prohibits) the use of protected data from state drivers’ databases [...]
Opinion recap: “Pay to delay” in deep trouble
Posted on June 17, 2013 at 4:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
Analysis Showing a strong suspicion that big drug companies with deep pockets may be using their money to shield shaky patent rights, the Supreme Court on Monday for the first time cleared the way for antitrust lawsuits to challenge payoffs between brand-name drugmakers to keep would-be competitors who make generic substitutes temporarily out of their market. But winning such lawsuits will hardly [...]