Breaking News :

Becton, Dickinson and Co. v. Retractable Technologies, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on January 7, 2013

Linked with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-1278 Fed. Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2012

Issue: (1) Whether the Federal Circuit’s construction of the “lodging” limitation should be reversed because, at the urging of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RTI), the Federal Circuit deviated from the term’s clear meaning on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body”; (2) whether the Federal Circuit’s construction of the “retainer member” limitation should be reversed because, at RTI’s urging, the Federal Circuit deviated from the term’s clear meaning on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body”; and (3) whether the Federal Circuit’s holding that the asserted claims cover devices that work by cutting should be reversed because, at RTI’s urging, the Federal Circuit disregarded a clear disclaimer of claim scope on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body.”

DateProceedings and Orders
Jan 18 2012Application (11A683) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2012 to March 19, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 19 2012Application (11A683) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 26, 2012.
Mar 20 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2012)
Apr 23 2012Brief amicus curiae of Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research filed.
Apr 24 2012Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 25, 2012.
May 25 2012Brief of respondent Becton, Dickinson and Company in opposition filed.
Jun 4 2012Reply of petitioners Retractable Technologies, Inc., and Thomas J. Shaw filed.
Jun 5 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 21, 2012.
Jun 25 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 28, 2012.
Jun 29 2012The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Nov 28 2012Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Dec 12 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013.
Dec 12 2012Supplemental brief of petitioners Retractable Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 7 2013Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
  • Featured Posts

  • Merits Case Pages and Archives

Term Snapshot
  • Videos see all

    Capture

    On Monday afternoon Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer testified before the House Appropriations Committee. The purpose of the hearing was to discuss the Court’s budget for the next fiscal year and the federal judiciary, but the legislators also took full advantage of the occasion to touch on other topics as well.

Awards
  • Peabody Award

    Peabody Award

    Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.

  • Sigma Delta Chi

    Sigma Delta Chi

    Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.

  • National Press Club Award

    National Press Club Award

    Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.

  • Silver Gavel Award

    Silver Gavel Award

    Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.

  • American Gavel Award

    American Gavel Award

    Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.

  • Webby Award

    Webby Award

    Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

  • Email Digest Sign-Up


  • Subscriptions



    RSS


    Twitter: Blog Staff Tweets


    Twitter: Each Blog Post, Tweeted