Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

There is a possibility of opinions on Tuesday, April 25. We will begin live-blogging at this link at 9:45 a.m.
On Tuesday the court hears oral argument in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County. Ronald Mann has our preview.
On Tuesday the court also hears oral argument in BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell. Amy Howe has our preview.

AU Optronics Corporation v. South Carolina

Petition for certiorari denied on January 21, 2014
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-911 4th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2013

Issue: Whether the citizenship of the persons on whose behalf monetary relief claims are brought by a state may satisfy the Class Action Fairness Act's minimal diversity requirement as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2)(A)-(C) and (d)(1)(D) for purposes of CAFA mass action jurisdiction even if those persons are not named plaintiffs.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Jan 23 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2013)
Feb 25 2013Brief of respondent South Carolina in opposition filed.
Mar 5 2013Reply of petitioners AU Optronics Corporation, et al. filed.
Mar 6 2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 22, 2013.
May 7 2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 23, 2013.
Jan 14 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 17, 2014.
Jan 21 2014Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards