Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week the blog will publish a multi-part online symposium on United States v. Texas, a challenge by Texas and twenty-five states to the Obama administration's deferred-action policy for immigration. Contributions to this special feature, as well as an “explainer” by this blog's Lyle Denniston, are available here.

AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
07-543 9th Cir. Dec 10, 2008
Tr.
May 18, 2009 7-2 Souter OT 2008

Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represented the respondent.

Issue: Whether employers violate Title VII by not fully restoring service credit for pregnancy leaves taken before the 1978 passage of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

Judgment: Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice David Souter on May 18, 2009.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merit briefs

Amicus briefs

Certiorari-Stage Documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards