Allshouse v. Pennsylvania

Petition for certiorari denied on May 13, 2013
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-1407 Pa. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2012
 
Share:

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, are among the counsel to the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted.

Issue: Whether a child’s statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. Washington.

Plain English Summary:

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Term Snapshot
Awards