Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

In previous years, the Court released orders the morning after the Court’s “Long Conference.” It has not done so this year. Beginning last Term, the Court consistently considered petitions at least two times before granting certiorari. To the extent that practice continues -- and there is no affirmative evidence the Court intends to drop it -- we would not expect orders granting certiorari today.

Marty Lederman Guest

Date Post Title
Next Page »
07.04.14 Commentary: Is the Court’s attempt at a compromise order in Wheaton College based upon a misunderstanding of the law?
06.20.14 Commentary: The fundamental constitutional principle not discussed in Lane v. Franks
06.17.14 Commentary: Susan B. Anthony List, Clapper footnote 5, and the state of Article III standing doctrine
04.08.14 DeWine v. DeWine (with the United States somewhere in between)
03.17.14 Commentary: The return of the Robert Bork “dueling briefs” strategy: Buckley v. Valeo, Susan B. Anthony List, and Ohio Attorney General DeWine
02.23.14 Symposium: How to understand Hobby Lobby
07.21.13 Untangling the two distinct questions in the new California marriage petitions
07.01.13 After Windsor: Michigan same-sex partners benefits suit advances [Updated: 7:49 p.m. & 8:49 p.m.]
06.26.13 The fate of same-sex marriage in California after Perry
06.17.13 Pyrrhic victory for federal government in Arizona voter registration case? [UPDATED with reference to Shelby County]
Term Snapshot
Awards