Petitions to watch | Conference of June 6, 2013
on May 29, 2013 at 10:59 pm
At its June 6, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the constitutionality of a state law protecting union picketing on private property, restitution for child pornography victims, the constitutional relevance of a defendant’s knowledge of an ordinance prohibiting “wholly passive conduct,” and patent infringement liability for joint performance of a process patent .
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case.
[PAGE]12-1162[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-1035[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-960[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-786[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-651[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-138[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-9[/PAGE]
[PAGE]11-681[/PAGE]
