Posted on February 23, 2010 at 10:20 am by Erin Miller
Continuing our series of five-minute podcasts on oral argument days, we have two new podcasts below with the counsel from both sides of todayâ€™s first case, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (08-1498; 09-89). Â At issue in the case is whether a federal statute prohibiting the knowing provision of â€œany service, training, [or] expert advice or assistanceâ€ to a designated foreign terrorist organization is unconstitutionally vague.
For the petitioners, one of their amici:
For the respondents, their counsel:
Subscribe to the SCOTUSblog feed on iTunes to receive our latest podcasts regularly.